The artificial intelligence-led digital revolution is upon us, and is set to change long-held habits across multiple industries. Are we right to be concerned or is it unjust paranoia?
The digital revolution, or as it is now commonly referred to, the “fourth revolution”, is by all accounts a revolution indeed.
From devices, we have moved to digitisation. Devices are simple, cheap pieces of junk that create value when they are used, mainly because they make, collect and interpret data. Research is no longer small and randomised; it’s big, where n = 10 million or a billion or even a trillion.
The Internet of things is now the Internet of everything, and the Age of the Intelligent Car is just beginning. Autonomous vehicles will become the norm in the next decade. No need for licenses. Don’t have to own a car, ever. Just hit the app and a car will arrive. With over 55,000 road deaths per annum across the OECD, the prediction is that driverless cars will dramatically reduce road deaths. No more accidents due to texting, fatigue or alcohol.
However, a legal opinion expressed in a letter from the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to Google confirmed that the artificial intelligence software it uses to control its self-driving cars could effectively be viewed as the “driver” for some regulatory purposes. Elsewhere, futurists are predicting that there will be over 1 million truck drivers who will lose their jobs in the US alone. Where does a truckie go to find work if transport is autonomous?
I see a world of increasing workers-at-home and decreasing business centralisation; longer-distance driving to work and longer commutes; one in which security and safety is a valuable additive; a world in which we are increasingly reluctant to be out-of-touch or not working for any serious period of time. The car is going to become a workplace, communications centre, an entertainment centre, a shopping centre.
Around the world, the taxi business is worried about Uber but the real enemies of their business model are a search engine, a space rocket company and a Swedish automotive company; Google, Tesla and Volvo. Uber itself is in the mix with their version of an autonomous vehicle and it may survive if its risk appetite is high and its hubris is low.
This fourth revolution means that businesses can expand and grow exponentially because their strategies are constructed under models that are scalable and repeatable, globally. Scaling and repeating doesn’t cost much money and it often requires very few people to maintain it.
Will the revolution bring about real change when it comes to diversity? We are evidencing clinical trials that are differentiating between men and women with big data, and the findings are powerful. Who knew, women are different to men!
Shopping, which was once a physical therapy is no longer simple retail because buying and consuming is no longer strictly linked to physical experience. If we look at the Australian supermarket trade, a long-term duopoly, we have always been referred to as the country where on a worldwide comparison, you can get the fastest national distribution of a product. Why? Because there have always been only two large providers. Get on their shelves and you are literally everywhere, instantly.
But now their tidy world is about to blow up. Amazon is coming and with a supermarket emphasis and a highly-refined but virtually-driven business model, the predictions are that it will likely have a major effect on our two giants, Coles and Woolworths, primarily because Amazon will change the way we buy groceries. It’s a simple, scalable model, based on the theory of consolidation and distribution via the Internet. Don’t believe that people won’t buy things like food off the net? They are, and they will continue to do so.
Will Amazon employ tens of thousands of people to run this new supermarket? No, people are not part of the fourth revolution; mass employment is a thing of the past. As for stores, they won’t look like a supermarket you’re used to seeing. There will be one or two buildings, located in an area far away from where you live. Tech-enabled, it will have very few people on site, all pick and pack done by bots and the shipping will be done by driverless trucks. Their balance sheet won’t include investing in property or infrastructure but rather it will be about investing in artificial intelligence and big data; sourcing and supplying products in ways that will have a lower cost base, fewer people costs, no infrastructure to speak of. And its strategic relationships? Well indirectly, that’s going to be with you. Yes you, the individual.
And now let’s move to my favourite, healthcare. The fourth revolution holds promise when it comes to affordability and equity whilst simultaneously finding ways to cannibalise and monetise your data.
Fear not; we have witnessed other revolutions; the Industrial Revolution which affected so many sectors like manufacturing and supply chain, creating a major disruption and a new world order. So, when it comes to healthcare be prepared because this particular revolution is tantamount to the deconstruction of medicine as we know it.
Artificial intelligence is the cornerstone of this revolution. It isn’t yet an entity in its own right but it is becoming as respected as the health professional.
Thanks to movements like Quantified Self, the Human Genome Project, and other health hacking organisations, the patient and their personal profile are starting to determine decisions. No cookie cutting here. The cry out from mainstream is: “I am as unique as my DNA” …so don’t try clustering me into the group of 200 patients who formed the research cohort that secured the FDA approval in 1963. I either want big data to justify the protocol or I want it to be about me and just me.
And not forgetting that trusty GP, Doctor Google; medicine is now patient directed rather than doctor directed. In fact, Google is now an official advisor to the CMS tracking things like flu outbreaks. It informs where the outbreak is happening, how many people are getting ill and informs the CMS as to the most likely type of flu, based on searches done by the public, which in turn informs the local emergency departments and drug suppliers to get ready. The digitisation of everything to do with health is about real-time collection and interpretation of information. Principally, it’s about the precision, accuracy and the accountability of data. Personalised, digitised and democratised.
To this extent, artificial intelligence is the cornerstone of this revolution. It isn’t yet an entity in its own right but it is becoming as respected as the health professional. Artificial intelligence is becoming the doctor of choice because it is able to coalesce the data that is being collected from a million of human tests and apply the decision-making protocols of thousands of medically trained brains to analyse across data sets of such magnitude, it eradicates the need for individualisation by comparing and contrasting the individual against a huge and continually growing data set.
So, will AI and specific algorithms be able to get medical negligence insurance? Your chest x-ray or the MRI on your brain will be interpreted based on millions of other x-rays and MRIs. So, the opinion expressed as to diagnosis and therapy is not just that of your doctor and his or her limited experience but that of the tens of thousands of doctors and their patient records collected over decades integrated into one diagnostic tool.
What then is the future of “intuition”, that very human gift of experiential learning? Well, the algorithms are trained to be able to measure and compare, analyse and determine the diagnosis. Its methods may appear to be limited to objective data but I promise you, it is learning so much so quickly that predictive intuition will start to appear. Just keep feeding in massive data and the algorithm will learn.
Also on The Big Smoke
- Robot lawyer gives free advice to asylum seekers
- How come a billion brains are making all the decisions about my health?
- Ford makes big play for autonomous ride sharing
Think about the commercially bought wearable; there are dozens of these devices being worn by millions of people. The Fitbit is collecting millions of data points across the globe about fitness and movement. But remember, it also knows where you are, where you live, your social media status, your sleep patterns, weight and height, and with a very simple stretch of data analysis, your risk of diabetes or cardiac disease. It might hold more valuable and powerful healthcare data than a government. Mobile, body worn healthcare devices are the fastest growing sector of wearables. They will outstrip all other wearables by 2019, just two years from now. The question is, what happens to all the so-called big data they collect? Will corporations hold more information about you than the government or your insurer?
All this data collection and interpretation creates a new risk for society: cybersecurity. Domestic, criminal, international; the black-market risk of data leakage and data theft is a daily reality. Literally, thousands of healthcare environments are hacked daily. It’s costing billions every year and hacking in healthcare is growing at 200% in the US and Australia is listed as #2 in the world for healthcare data security break-ins/theft, second only to the US. Australian healthcare companies are being held to ransom by hackers and that ransom is being paid. I literally mean ransom money is being paid to cyber criminals to give the data back safely.
Control of the information is not just about security, though. We can’t guarantee we actually know who has the right to the data, who owns the data. For example, the benefits of electronic medical records are obvious and there is hardly a western government that is not investing in the implementation of opt-in EMRs. It’s opt-in now but by the time our children (or my grandchildren) are adults, it will be compulsory for insurance reasons.
If we think about compulsory, integrated EMRs for a minute, should your dentist know your reproductive status? Should your insurer know your metabolic status? Should your gym know your cardiac history? The answer is not binary.
One final anecdote for us to think about. Will the revolution bring about a real change when it comes to matters of diversity? For the first time, we are evidencing clinical trials that are differentiating between men and women. Traditionally this has not been the case but with big data, it is now possible and the findings are really powerful. Who knew, women are different to men!
But generally, though there are some small gains happening, we know that there are hardly any women appointed to our front bench of Parliament, less than 25% of public company boards are female and women are still paid significantly less than men. And having been one of the less than 4% of female’s CEOs of a public company, I can assure you it is lonely at the top. There’s hardly anyone who isn’t pale, stale and male.
What then is the future of “intuition”, that very human gift of experiential learning? Well, the algorithms are trained… learning so much so quickly that predictive intuition will start to appear. Just keep feeding in massive data and the algorithm will learn.
What is starting to generate interest is the fact that there is validated evidence that companies with a more diverse board are more profitable. Profit. This will always attract interest! But diversity comes in so many different manifestations. It’s not just gender related. Older people have a massive amount of experience and wisdom and younger people if well directed could have a lot to contribute to boards. I know from experience, a board with mixed ethnicity, abled and disabled and gender diverse, will always drive better outcomes.
Challenging the notion of the pale, stale male is multifaceted and progress is slow, so you can imagine how excited I was when I heard that a company had diversified by appointing an algorithm to its board of directors. Women everywhere battle to get a crack at this position and now an algorithm has got there. What an interesting but unbiased board member! This particular company focuses on drugs for age-related diseases and the board is forced to make various decisions and recommendations by sifting through large amounts of data.
Apparently, the board has welcomed the algorithm, which formally attends each board meeting providing specific reports. It looks at a range of data including financial information, clinical trials, intellectual property owned by the firm and previous funding. In this case the algorithm retains formal voting rights, approving of investments and influencing the other board members. This is an interesting expression of artificial intelligence personhood.
So, is the algorithm aware of its fiduciary rights or the corporations act? I would think not. It makes no sense at all to think that the algorithm will actually be responsible for the decisions made by the board, but make no mistake, the rest of the board will be called to account if their decisions prove to be wrong or negligent, and blaming the algorithm isn’t likely to be a defence.
Or is it? It is unbelievable but here we have it; as women and other marginalised members of society continue to fight to gain positions of influence and authority, we find ourselves facing yet another foe that we will never be able to match: artificial intelligence.
Should we be happy and excited about the future? Absolutely we should. But be prepared to be challenged and disrupted as old values disappear, being replaced with new processes and paradigms. Would this manifest in a more inclusive society? I say no, just one that is more connected and democratised.