Ugur Nedim

Officer who leaked victim’s address to abusive ex charged, will front court

The QLD police officer that misused his powers has now been charged without fronting court. Despite this, the system continues to protect him.

 

 

The Queensland Police officer who was found to have unlawfully accessed a police database and leaked a domestic violence victim’s details to his friend, the woman’s abusive former partner, has been charged with multiple criminal offences.

An internal police investigation found that senior constable Neil Punchard illegally accessed the QPrime police database and provided the victim’s new address to her ex. It was further found that the officer even advised his friend to, “Just tell her you know where she lives and leave it at that. Lol. She will flip.”

The abuser had threatened to kill his former partner, strap bombs to their two children and blow them up as “martyrs”.

He is understood to have fled to Greece after failing to appear in court to face a charge of contravening an apprehended domestic violence order.

Despite putting the victim in danger and even joking about it, officer Punchard was not suspended and remained on duty.

The Queensland Police Service (QPS) and the state government have been under sustained public pressure to act since details of the conduct first emerged in the media. However, neither the police commissioner, White Ribbon ambassador Ian Stewart, nor premier Annastacia Palaszczuk signalled any intention to act upon the matter.

 

Proceedings for privacy breach

The victim has been seeking compensation through Queensland’s Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) on the basis that officer Punchard breached her privacy and put her life, and the lives of her children, at risk. She was forced into hiding as a result of the conduct.

As the QCAT hearing progressed, allegations emerged that a car belonging to the abuser was transferred into officer Punchard’s name at around the time he accessed and leaked the victim’s details.

 

Attempts to suppress information and evade responsibility

Police originally tried to suppress this information, submitting to QCAT that it had nothing to do with the victim’s compensation case.

However, there was enough evidence for the Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) to launch a fresh investigation into the officer’s conduct.

At the QCAT hearing, officer Punchard invoked his privilege against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions.

The officer and the Queensland government were separately represented by legal teams, while the victim was left to represent herself.

The QCAT has already found that the law does not allow actions to be taken in the tribunal against officer Punchard, and the government’s barrister has submitted that the state cannot be held responsible for the actions of a rogue police officer.


Also on The Big Smoke


The tribunal’s decision in respect of the proceedings against the state is pending.

Officer Punchard has been charged with nine computer hacking offences and is due to appear before Brisbane Magistrates Court on the 30th of January 2019.

The QPS has not advised whether he will be been stood down, but a spokesperson said in a statement:

“This matter will be subject to further consideration within the QPS disciplinary system”, adding, “This does not mean that the allegations against the officer have been substantiated.”

 

Ugur Nedim

Ugur Nedim is an Accredited Criminal Law Specialist and the Principal of Sydney Criminal Lawyers, a leading Sydney Law Firm that specialises in Criminal Law and Traffic cases. http://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au

Related posts

Top